W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: [Action] Proposal to address issues 394, 359, 358, 322, and 321 (checkpoints 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 2.7, definitions)

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:48:35 -0500
Message-ID: <3A9534D3.7A58F124@w3.org>
To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Jon Gunderson wrote:
> 
> Ian,
> First, I would like to thank Ian, Eric and Al for their work on this
> proposal.  They have spent a lot of time discussing the issues and as chair
> I appreciate their efforts.
> 
> QUESTION: What happened to the part of Checkpoint 2.3 that allowed for
> substitution of alternative content of C for the original C?  The proposal
> seems to talk about additional rendering, providing a link and query access
> to alternative content of C.

I think you're right that that was inadvertently left out
of c.1.

 - Ian
-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2001 10:48:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:29 UTC