W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: Meaning of "important special case"

From: Hansen, Eric <ehansen@ets.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:50:34 -0500
To: "'Ian Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>, "Hansen, Eric" <ehansen@ets.org>
Cc: "UA List (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Message-id: <B49B36B1086DD41187DC000077893CFB8B4759@rosnt46.ets.org>
Seems reasonable...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 4:47 PM
> To: Hansen, Eric
> Cc: UA List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Meaning of "important special case"
> 
> 
> "Hansen, Eric" wrote:
> > 
> > I can see what you are saying, but it sort of begs the 
> question, "If it is
> > so 'important' and 'special', why isn't it _at least_ as 
> important (in terms
> > of priority) as the checkpoint of which it is a special case?"
> > 
> > I tend to think of a special case as a 'subset' or a closer look at
> > something and that an 'important' special case would be at least as
> > important in terms of 'priority'.....
> > 
> > Maybe we should say that checkpoint 9.6 (P3) is an 
> "_unimportant_ special
> > case" of checkpoint 9.3 (P2)....!?
> 
> Or just "special case"
> 
>  - Ian
> 
> -- 
> Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
> Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
> 
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2001 16:53:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:29 UTC