W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive technology"?

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:27:44 -0600
To: "'Harvey Bingham'" <hbingham@ACM.org>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002c01c0b957$ea999180$b2176880@trace.wisc.edu>
This is the definition taken from the "assistive technology act"


-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Human Factors
Depts of Ind. and Biomed. Engr. - U of Wis.
Director - Trace R & D Center
Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/
FAX 608/262-8848
For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org]  On
Behalf Of Harvey Bingham
Sent:	Thursday, March 29, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Subject:	Re: [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive

At 2001-03-28 19:16, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>The WCAG WG suggested [0] that UAAG 1.0 adopt the definition
>of "assistive technology" used in US Federal regulations.
>The following definition appears in Section 508 final rule [1]:
>   "Assistive technology.
>   Any item, piece of equipment, or system, whether acquired
>   commercially, modified, or customized, that is commonly
>   used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities
>   of individuals with disabilities."

HB: I agree that this should be included. OK at the end.

>Compare to our definition in the 23 March draft [2]:

[outside the scope of]

>  this document, assistive technologies consist of software
>or hardware that has been specifically designed to assist people
>with disabilities in carrying out daily activities, e.g.,
>wheelchairs, reading machines, devices for grasping, text
>telephones, vibrating pagers, etc.

HB: instead of reading machines: [mechanical aids for reading printed

>What if we combine the two? Start with the Section 508 definition
>(and quote section 508), then "transition" into the specific
>idea of assistive technology as used in this document?

HB: Politically correct to reference Section 508, OK at the end (and
include it in the 5.3 Informative References.)

>Note: I will be satisfied if we make no changes to the document.
>  - Ian
Regards/Harvey Bingham
Received on Friday, 30 March 2001 15:29:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:30 UTC