- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 17:40:48 -0500
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- CC: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>, User Agent Working group list <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
I vote for "motionless, unblinking text". - Ian Al Gilman wrote: > > At 10:24 AM 2001-01-04 -0500, David Poehlman wrote: > >below are two checkpoints with the word motionless in them. I know > >I've seen them before but it occurred to me that blinking is not > >actually motion and that for both, perhaps the word static would be > >better than motionless? > > > > 3.3 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render animated > >or > > blinking text as motionless text. [Priority 1] > > Content type labels: VisualText. > > Techniques for checkpoint 3.3 > > > > 3.4 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render blinking > > images as motionless images. [Priority 1] > > Content type labels: Color, Animation. > > Techniques for checkpoint 3.4 > > > > AG:: > > Good point. On the other hand, 'static' risks confusion with issues of > dynamic > content. > > Other terms that might work here: unchanging, frozen, unblinking, "an > unchanging display." > > Al > > >Hands-On Technolog(eye)s > >touching the internet > ><mailto:poehlman1@home.com>mailto:poehlman1@home.com > >voice: 301.949.7599 > >---end sig--- > > -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Friday, 5 January 2001 17:52:38 UTC