W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Proposal checkpiont 2.7: Solution for repair text shouldnot be minimal requirement

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:23:33 -0500
Message-ID: <3AB937F5.1D4E583A@w3.org>
To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Jon Gunderson wrote:
> 
> Ian,
> Could you add to the list of options in the checkpoint the techniques you
> outlined.
> 
> <IAN PROPOSED>
> ...
> The user agent may satisfy this checkpoint by basing the repair text 
> on any of the following available sources of information:
> URI reference, content type, or element type.
> </IAN PROPOSED>
> 
> <NEW>
> ...
> The user agent may satisfy this checkpoint by basing the repair text
> on any of the following available sources of information:
> URI reference, content type, element type or the content of the URI.
> <NEW>

Jon, 

I'm not sure what you mean by "content of the URI". If you mean
"the entire content of the resource referenced by the URI" 
then I don't think I agree.

If you mean "parts of the URI string of characters",
that's the URI reference.

 - Ian

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2001 18:23:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:38 GMT