W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report

From: jon gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:15:57 -0600 (CST)
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
cc: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, Harvey Bingham <hbingham@ACM.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10103071614230.8879-100000@staff3.cso.uiuc.edu>
Right.  A developer can always do more, but for purposes of conformance
their would be no requirement to satisfy any Triple-A checkpoints.  We
always want to encourage developers to do more.

Jon


On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Ian Jacobs wrote:

> Jon Gunderson wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >Clarification for me: the language "at least Level Double-A" means it
> > >may also meet some Triple-A checkpoints.
> > 
> > JRG: No it does not, no Triple A checkpoints would need to be met for
> > Double-A conformance.
> 
> I believe you are saying the same thing: our checkpoint would
> not require that any P3 checkpoints be satisfied, but would not
> forbid the UA from satisfying them.
> 
>   -Ian
> -- 
> Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
> Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 17:16:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:38 GMT