W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Instruction and Assessment

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:00:41 -0500
Message-ID: <3A76D719.672C8814@w3.org>
To: "Hansen, Eric" <ehansen@ets.org>
CC: "'Jon Gunderson '" <jongund@uiuc.edu>, "'UA List (E-mail) '" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
"Hansen, Eric" wrote:
> 
> One follow-up thought.
> 
> Perhaps one way to think about this issue is that the User Agent should "by
> default" not restrict access to any content. If some content uses the user
> agent to restrict access to certain content (or even if the user agent makes
> it easy for the content author to restrict access) to some content (e.g.,
> for security or other special purposes or applications) then that is okay.

I think that amounts to saying: "conform to specifications". Otherwise,
if a user agent haphazardly denies access to some content, it's probably
just a bug.

> It is not the responsibility of user agent developers to forbid such
> activity, but rather to ensure that in the default situation, the user would
> have access to all content. Obviously, the realization of full access will
> be dependent on authors developing content that permits such access (e.g.,
> following WCAG 1.0, other accessibility conventions, etc.).
> 
> Isn't this approach in keeping with our delineation of responsibilities? Do
> we lose anything by taking this approach?

What does 'taking this approach' mean exactly?

 - Ian

> I suppose that such an approach
> impinges on our UAAG 1.0 checkpoints insofar as user agents 
> product content (one checkpoint).



-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2001 10:00:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:29 UTC