W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: motionless?

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 11:49:19 -0500
Message-Id: <200101041643.LAA381544@smtp2.mail.iamworld.net>
To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@home.com>, "User Agent Working group list" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
At 10:24 AM 2001-01-04 -0500, David Poehlman wrote:
>below are two checkpoints with the word motionless in them.  I know
>I've seen them before but it occurred to me that blinking is not
>actually motion and that for both, perhaps the word static would be
>better than motionless?
>
>   3.3 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render animated
>or
>          blinking text as motionless text. [Priority 1]
>          Content type labels: VisualText.
>          Techniques for checkpoint 3.3
>
>   3.4 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render blinking
>          images as motionless images. [Priority 1]
>          Content type labels: Color, Animation.
>          Techniques for checkpoint 3.4
>

AG::

Good point.  On the other hand, 'static' risks confusion with issues of
dynamic
content.

Other terms that might work here:  unchanging, frozen, unblinking, "an
unchanging display."

Al

>Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
>touching the internet
><mailto:poehlman1@home.com>mailto:poehlman1@home.com
>voice: 301.949.7599
>---end sig---
>  
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 11:43:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:29 UTC