W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 08:14:53 -0500 (EST)
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
cc: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103080812470.12357-100000@tux.w3.org>
I don't see that there is a problem using the method Aaron suggested. It
would enable a user agent to seperately queue the changes to a document that
gets updated on the fly, which seems like a good thing since they could be
offered to the user who had asked for a page to stay still, as a seperate
item. It might be helpful to have this available, and I  can't see that it
breaks anything we need.

So I would propose to instead add this as a technique.

cheers

Charles McCN

On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Ian Jacobs wrote:

  Hello,

  I would like to propose the following editorial changes
  to the document based on a review by Aaron Leventhal
  (thanks Aaron!).

  I intend to incorporate these into the next draft
  unless there are objections.

  Reference document 24 Feb 2001 draft [1].

  1) Checkpoints 3.5/3.5

     3.5 Allow configuration so that client-side content refreshes
     (i.e., those initiated by the user agent, not the server)
     do not change content except on explicit user request.

  Aaron suggested that this might be interpreted as meaning
  "compare and see if the refresh changed the content or not".

  Proposed change:

     Allow configuration so that the user agent does not
     perform client-side content refreshes (i.e., those
     initiated by the user agent, not the server)
     except on explicit user request.

  I propose the same type of change to checkpoint 3.6:

[snip]
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 08:14:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:29 UTC