W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 10:27:18 -0500
Message-ID: <3AA7A4D6.B4F5D88@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> 
> I don't see that there is a problem using the method Aaron suggested. It
> would enable a user agent to seperately queue the changes to a document that
> gets updated on the fly, which seems like a good thing since they could be
> offered to the user who had asked for a page to stay still, as a seperate
> item. It might be helpful to have this available, and I  can't see that it
> breaks anything we need.
> 
> So I would propose to instead add this as a technique.

Would you object to the editorial change?

 _ Ian
 

>   Reference document 24 Feb 2001 draft [1].
> 
>   1) Checkpoints 3.5/3.5
> 
>      3.5 Allow configuration so that client-side content refreshes
>      (i.e., those initiated by the user agent, not the server)
>      do not change content except on explicit user request.
> 
>   Aaron suggested that this might be interpreted as meaning
>   "compare and see if the refresh changed the content or not".
> 
>   Proposed change:
> 
>      Allow configuration so that the user agent does not
>      perform client-side content refreshes (i.e., those
>      initiated by the user agent, not the server)
>      except on explicit user request.
> 
>   I propose the same type of change to checkpoint 3.6:
> 
> [snip]

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 10:27:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:29 UTC