W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: Responses to Eric Hansen issue raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0

From: Hansen, Eric <ehansen@ets.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 01:07:16 -0500
To: "'Ian Jacobs '" <ij@w3.org>, "Hansen, Eric" <ehansen@ets.org>
Cc: "'w3c-wai-ua@w3.org '" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Message-id: <B49B36B1086DD41187DC000077893CFB8B4940@rosnt46.ets.org>
Yes. I am satisfied. Thanks...

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Jacobs
To: ehansen@ets.org
Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Sent: 3/16/01 10:52 PM
Subject: Responses to Eric Hansen issue raised during second last call of
UAAG 1.0


Please find below a summary of how the UAWG addressed the
non-editorial last call issue (322) you raised;
please refer to the email source of the issues [0].

The complete second last call issues list [1] is available
online. The results of the UAWG's resolutions have been
incorporated into the 9 March 2001 draft of the document [2].

  NOTE: The issue titles relate to the 23 October 2000 last call
  draft [4]. In my comments below, checkpoint numbers, etc. have
  been updated to correspond to the 9 March 2001 draft.

Please indicate before 27 March whether you are satisfied with
the UAWG's resolutions, whether you wish the WG to carry forward
any objections to the Director as the document advances, or
whether you require further clarification or comment. If you do
not think you respond before 27 March, please let me know.  The
Director will appreciate a response whether you agree with the
disposition of comments or not. More information about the
process we are following is available in section 5.5.2 of the W3C
Process Document [3].

On behalf of the UAWG, thank you for your review and comments,

 - Ian

[0] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2000OctDec/0131
[1] http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WD-UAAG10-20010309/
[3] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010208/tr.html#last-call
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-20001023/

The UAWG agreed with you:

#322: The definition of the word "element "

  Comment: I presume that since you were involved with the resolution
  to this issue (refer to proposal [5]), that you are satisfied. To
  summarize: the UAWG has decided to rely more heavily on WCAG 1.0
  definitions for terms related to content (including the term

  [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0249

Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Saturday, 17 March 2001 01:07:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:29 UTC