public-html@w3.org from November 2008 by author

Al Gilman

• request for input on organizing (ARIA, HTML)-to-API work (Friday, 28 November)
• Re: your action? about @headers etc. (Monday, 17 November)
• micro-process on @headers and friends [was: Re: how to collaborate with the HTML WG (what works)] (Friday, 7 November)
• how to collaborate with the HTML WG (what works) (Tuesday, 4 November)

Alexandre Alapetite

• Re: Question about @id validation in XHTML5 (Sunday, 16 November)
• Question about @id validation in XHTML5 (Sunday, 16 November)

Andi Sidwell

• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 15 November)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: Selectors Tests (Wednesday, 12 November)

Asbjørn Ulsberg

• Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)

Ben Millard

• Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: your action? about @headers etc. (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: your action? about @headers etc. (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2008-11-13 - markup-spec discussion (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2008-11-13 - markup-spec discussion (Friday, 14 November)
• Updating the HTMLWG Web Pages (Friday, 7 November)
• Re: <q> Research & Conclusions (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: Final thoughts on <q> (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: <q> Research & Conclusions (Wednesday, 5 November)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)

Brad Kemper

• Re: Selectors Tests (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Selectors Tests (Wednesday, 12 November)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 6258] New: Changing the encoding doesn't cover non-idempotent navigation (Saturday, 29 November)
• [Bug 6257] New: Please specify document.write()-safe points in the parse (Saturday, 29 November)
• [Bug 6256] New: Mutation event behavior on document.open() unspecified (Saturday, 29 November)
• [Bug 6254] New: xref errors in the <input> summary table (Thursday, 27 November)
• [Bug 6253] New: <input> bookkeeping aren't consistent (Thursday, 27 November)
• [Bug 6236] New: scroll bar placement in frames (Wednesday, 19 November)
• [Bug 6216] New: <script> in <select> (Tuesday, 11 November)
• [Bug 6214] New: insertRow without arguments (Monday, 10 November)
• [Bug 6213] New: Noscript content model with script allows fragment parse errors (Monday, 10 November)

Cameron McCormack

• HTMLSelectElement.add() (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters (Monday, 17 November)
• [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters (Monday, 17 November)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Authoring Guide (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Selectors API: New Last Call (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: [whatwg] Context help in Web Forms (Friday, 7 November)

Chris Double

• Re: bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate (Thursday, 20 November)

Chris Wilson

• RE: Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Likely regrets for Thursday's call (Tuesday, 11 November)

Dan Connolly

• charter diffs [was: An HTML language spec...] (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: what's the language of a document ? (Thursday, 13 November)
• what's the language of a document ? (Thursday, 13 November)

Daniel Schattenkirchner

• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Sunday, 9 November)
• Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Saturday, 8 November)

Dave Singer

• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Thursday, 27 November)

David Orchard

• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)

Dean Edridge

• Language Specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)

Dmitry Turin

• Prompt, please, into which door i must to knock (was: budget to implement HTML6) (Wednesday, 12 November)
• budget to implement HTML6 (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker) (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Wednesday, 5 November)
• budget to implement HTML6 (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re[2]: budget to implement HTML6 (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Tuesday, 4 November)
• budget to implement HTML6 (Tuesday, 4 November)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

• Re: metadata content (Wednesday, 19 November)
• metadata content (Tuesday, 18 November)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Doctype in "HTML: The Markup Language" (Monday, 17 November)

Elliotte Harold

• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)

Eric Carlson

• HTMLMediaElement - detecting startup hysterisis (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Sunday, 23 November)
• setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Sunday, 23 November)
• HTMLMediaElement defaultPlaybackRate and playbackRate (Saturday, 22 November)
• HTMLMediaElement readyState (Thursday, 20 November)
• bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate (Thursday, 20 November)

fantasai

• Re: Selectors Tests (Thursday, 13 November)

Gavin Sharp

• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)

Gez Lemon

• Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Tuesday, 25 November)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

• Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages (Wednesday, 5 November)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm (Sunday, 30 November)
• Mutation events and document.open() (Saturday, 29 November)
• Re: document.write from event handlers (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: document.write from event handlers (was: Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node) (Thursday, 27 November)
• document.write from event handlers (was: Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node) (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Line breaks in the placeholder attribute (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: charter diffs [was: An HTML language spec...] (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
• document.close() in document.write() (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: metadata content (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Point at which script blocks the parser (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Re-entrant invocation of the tree builder (Monday, 17 November)
• Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Question about @id validation in XHTML5 (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Sunday, 16 November)
• Escaping text span and character references (Sunday, 16 November)
• Nesting optgroups (Sunday, 16 November)
• Doctype in "HTML: The Markup Language" (Sunday, 16 November)
• "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Sunday, 9 November)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)

Håkon Wium Lie

• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm (Sunday, 30 November)
• Re: [whatwg] Citing multiple <blockquote> elements in HTML5 (Sunday, 30 November)
• <q> omnibus (Sunday, 30 November)
• Re: Ratios Do Not Return Errors (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) (Sunday, 30 November)
• Re: Authoring requirements and default values with progress and meter (Sunday, 30 November)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Saturday, 29 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Database section feedback (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Text presentation of image maps with <object> (detailed review of Semantics) (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Image map feedback (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Web Forms 2 input type=email (was Re: autosubmit) (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: metadata content (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Contexts in which <menu> is allowed (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: checked attribute on non-radio, non-checkbox commands (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Web sockets: typo (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: State transitions for media elements (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: Buffered bytes for media elements (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: what's the language of a document ? (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: what's the language of a document ? (Thursday, 13 November)
• RE: Workers (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: willValidate and image controls (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: HTMLOptionElement constructor (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: Events and disabled form controls (Friday, 7 November)
• Re: Nested forms (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: [WF2] HTMLFormElement.accept vs. function accept(){} (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: Conformance requirements for accept-charset (Saturday, 1 November)
• Re: External conformance dependency in forms (Saturday, 1 November)
• Re: Space in pseudo-BNF for accept attribute for file upload controls (Saturday, 1 November)
• Re: <q> vs <p> (Saturday, 1 November)
• Re: Final thoughts on <q> (Saturday, 1 November)
• RE: <q> (Saturday, 1 November)

James Graham

• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 16 November)

Jim Jewett

• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• English analogy [was: Re: Splitting up the spec] (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec - archive info (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• video: various width/height attributes (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)
• markup spec [was: Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification?] (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)

John Kemp

• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Authoring Guide (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: [Bug 6214] New: insertRow without arguments (Tuesday, 11 November)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Monday, 24 November)

Julian Reschke

• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: charter diffs [was: An HTML language spec...] (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker) (Thursday, 6 November)

Justin James

• RE: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
• RE: Workers (Thursday, 13 November)
• RE: Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker) (Thursday, 6 November)

Kornel Lesinski

• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)

Lachlan Hunt

• [html-author] Authoring Guide Progress Update (Friday, 28 November)
• Re: Authoring Guide (was: Splitting up the spec) (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Wednesday, 19 November)

Laura Carlson

• Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Tuesday, 25 November)

Lee Kowalkowski

• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
• The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Monday, 10 November)

Marco Neumann

• Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Tuesday, 4 November)

Mark Baker

• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
• An HTML language specification (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Tuesday, 4 November)

Michael A. Puls II

• Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events (Wednesday, 12 November)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Thursday, 20 November)
• How the markup spec is put together [was: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal?] (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Doctype in "HTML: The Markup Language" (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2008-11-13 - markup-spec discussion (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
• "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
• Summary: HTML WG October 2008 face-to-face meeting (Wednesday, 12 November)
• {minutes} 2008-10-24 f2f meeting (day two) (Friday, 7 November)
• {minutes} 2008-10-23 f2f meeting (day one) (Friday, 7 November)
• no telcon this week (Thursday, 6 November)

Nikunj Mehta

• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: HTMLMediaElement readyState (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: State transitions for media elements (Sunday, 16 November)

Philip Taylor

• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: document.close() in document.write() (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Minor form enctype errors (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Parsing problem with misnested tags (Tuesday, 11 November)

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)

• Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• [Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification] (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: markup spec [was: Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification?] (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Language Specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Selectors Tests (Wednesday, 12 November)

Pierre-Olivier Latour

• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Monday, 24 November)

Rob Sayre

• Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)

Robert J Burns

• Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Friday, 14 November)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Tuesday, 11 November)

Smylers

• Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: how to collaborate with the HTML WG (what works) (Friday, 7 November)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)

Toby A Inkster

• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Splitting up the spec (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)

Travis Leithead

• RE: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Tuesday, 11 November)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 November 2008 22:55:38 UTC