W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification?

From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:27:56 +0900
To: Ben Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>
Cc: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20081120072754.GB20151@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Ben Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>, 2008-11-19 11:06 -0000:

>  Would it be worth making a poll about whether to publish a normative 
>  language specification as a W3C Working Draft?

It might well be at some point, but I don't think we are at that
point yet. We've only very recently begun to have a discussion
about the idea of delivering such as document at all.

>  That might help clarify whether the predominate disagreements are:
>  * fundamental objections to doing this at all;

It seems clear already that we do have some fundamental objections
to doing it at all. At least to having something in the general
form of the draft I put together, and to it being normative.

But then I can't think of a single instance of any decisions we've
made (or tried to make) in this group that someone didn't object to.


Michael(tm) Smith
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2008 07:28:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:39 UTC