I am volunteering to prepare this proposal. I will also separately report detailed issues with the offline caching behavior as specified in the current draft. Nikunj On Nov 23, 2008, at 3:39 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: >> ... >>> If they are not final-with-implementations, then there may well be >>> feedback and editing changes that Nikunj is offering to deal with. >> Given the small amount of work that is involved here, it really >> wouldn't help us move the spec along faster. >> ... > > But it would result in a smaller HTML5 spec, and potentially that > new spec to be published earlier. > >>> If they are final-with-implementations, and can't really be >>> changed, then it makes sense to split them out and publish them >> I agree, and would be happy to do that once we have less pressing >> matters. > > It seems that there is disagreement about what matters are pressing. > > I'd recommend that Nikunj makes a concrete proposal (in particular > what parts to extract) to the list and the chairs, which we can then > review and decide upon. > >>> so people won't waste time suggesting implausible changes. >> That hasn't been a problem so far for those sections (with the >> exception of some suggestions from Nikunj himself). > > We're talking about an editor, not an author. I wouldn't expect the > editor Nikunj to make non-editorial changes without the support of > the WG. > >> ... > > BR, JulianReceived on Sunday, 23 November 2008 15:35:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:26 GMT