W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2008

Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:56:25 +0100
Message-ID: <492C1219.5050003@gmx.de>
To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org

Jim Jewett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>> The AUDITNAV method is used to report a page navigation. The Request-URI
>> represents a link auditing processor. The source and target of the page
>> navigation are reported using the Ping-From and Ping-To
> Should those change to Audit-Nav-From and Audit-Nav-To?
>> The server's response must have an entity body
> Why?

There's a distinction between having "no message body" and having a 
message body of zero length; see 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.4.3> for the 

BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 14:57:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:39 UTC