- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:39:04 -0800
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Asbjørn Ulsberg <list@asbjorn.ulsberg.no>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > > Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:37:48 +0100, Lachlan Hunt >> <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: >>> The authoring guide, of which I am the current editor... >> >> I wasn't aware of the authoring guide before this, and after skimming >> through, it seems like a large step in the right direction. What is >> the best place to discuss this guide? Here on the HTML WG list? > > Yes, either here on public-html or on public-html-comments. > >> And what will be the relationship between the HTML5 specification and >> the authoring guide? > > I'm not sure I understand the question. Could you please elaborate? > >> The authoring guide will of course reference the HTML5 specification, >> but what about the other way around? Can an informative reference to >> the authoring guide be present in the HTML5 specification? > > Once it gets published as an FPWD, then informatively referencing the > guide from the spec is possible, if there is somewhere in the spec from > where such a reference would be appropriate. I definitely think that we should have such an informal reference somewhere close to the top of the spec. Anything we can do to attract attention to the authoring guide is a good thing IMHO. We do want both HTML authors as well as tutorial authors to read this document. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 21:42:09 UTC