Re: Splitting up the spec

Jonas Sicking wrote:
> ...
> So lets put it the other way around. Say that the CSS 1 spec would
> have looked the way it does, but it also defined the rel and name
> attributes for the <link> tag, and how they are used to link
> alternate, preferred and persistent stylesheets to HTML. Don't you
> think that someone would have said "That stuff doesn't belong in the
> CSS spec, that is HTML specific, CSS doesn't define how a specific
> markup language should link to CSS"?
> ...

Good point.

Funny enough, that's exactly what we have in the situation of XML and 
XSLT (where the PI is described in a separate document).

BR, Julian