W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2008

Re: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:12:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4912C313.90600@gmx.de>
To: Dmitry Turin <html60@narod.ru>
CC: public-html@w3.org

Dmitry Turin wrote:
>>> communication via SQL5 [3] over TCP (to avoid HTTP as redundant gasket [4]
> 
>> SQL was designed for database access
> 
> 
> 
> HTTP was converted into Baments (<?bament/?>, slides #27-26 of http://sql50.euro.ru/sql5.16.4.pdf).
> 
> Baments, as well as Saments
> 
> (Sent eleMENT, i.e. usual xml-element, including html-elements as particular case of xml-element)
> 
> was incapsulated into SQL syntax.
> 
> Composition (SQL+Saments+Baments) obtained name SQL5, and transfered just over TCP.
> 
> 
> 
> Main difference between HTTP and SQL5 consist of that, Baments traffic does not close TCP-connection
> 
> (in opposite to HTTP, which, as i know, do this).
> ...

I have trouble understanding how this whole discussion is related to the 
HTML WG. Is any of the things you are proposing in the WG's charter?

That being said, HTTP has had kept-alive connections since HTTP/1.1.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 10:20:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:24 GMT