W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2008

Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:25:01 +0100
Message-ID: <4922EC5D.2050404@gmx.de>
To: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>

Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17 Nov 2008, at 23:10, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> Furthermore, the checklist you suggest seems to be written with the 
>> intent of discouraging anybody coming up.
> 
> What do you think the process should be?
> ...

Funny enough it's in the paragraph you did not quote:

JR> The working group should make a decision whether a split is feasible 
and a good thing to do, and then should select one or multiple editors. 
But "go ahead, waste your time, until we'll tell you that you're not a 
second Ian after all" will not fly.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:25:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:24 GMT