- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:56:24 -0500
- To: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Robert J Burns wrote: > I didn't intend to cause such a reaction. I thought it was clear that > the strengths of the current editor was in the area of browser behavior > (and not so much parsing and certainly not HTML authoring vocabulary). I will note that you have not answered the question Maciej and I raised. So again. Who, in you opinion, is more qualified to address HTML parsing? > TAG and others have wondered whether the work on HTML 5 could benefit > from some division of labor and I simply wanted to suggest that those > three areas would be a great way to modularize this effort. The prerequisite to this (even if desirable, and I urge you to read Ian's old posts about interdepencies before deciding whether it's desirable) is finding editors. Which comes back to the question of who is qualified to edit. -Boris
Received on Sunday, 16 November 2008 16:57:10 UTC