W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Authoring Guide

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:10:36 +0100
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Cc: Asbjørn Ulsberg <list@asbjorn.ulsberg.no>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uk66nyrywxe0ny@widsith>

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:39:04 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:

>
> Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>>  Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:37:48 +0100, Lachlan Hunt  
>>> <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote:
>>>> The authoring guide, of which I am the current editor...
>>>
>>> I wasn't aware of the authoring guide before this, and after skimming
>>> through, it seems like a large step in the right direction. What is  
>>> the best place to discuss this guide? Here on the HTML WG list?
>>  Yes, either here on public-html or on public-html-comments.

> I definitely think that we should have such an informal reference  
> somewhere close to the top of the spec. Anything we can do to attract  
> attention to the authoring guide is a good thing IMHO. We do want both  
> HTML authors as well as tutorial authors to read this document.

And even more importantly, tool authors. We know they don't save us, but  
they can certainly cause us to suffer if ew don't make it clear what they  
should see...

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 23:11:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:27 GMT