Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, Elliotte Harold wrote:
>> Error correction is much more problematic.
>>
>> In essence, the path taken by HTML 5 is that there is no such thing as a 
>> document which is in error. All byte streams become legal HTML 
>> documents. That's not how they phrase it, but that's the effect.
> 
> How is this different from what HTML4 did? HTML4 said "this is what is 
> valid, and everything else should work too". 

Where did it say this ?

Philip TAYLOR