W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08

From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:38:39 +0000
Message-ID: <49211F7F.8070900@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, Elliotte Harold wrote:
>> Error correction is much more problematic.
>> In essence, the path taken by HTML 5 is that there is no such thing as a 
>> document which is in error. All byte streams become legal HTML 
>> documents. That's not how they phrase it, but that's the effect.
> How is this different from what HTML4 did? HTML4 said "this is what is 
> valid, and everything else should work too". 

Where did it say this ?

Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 07:39:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:39 UTC