W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2008

Re: PFWG report on @headers status

From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:24:22 +0000
Message-ID: <492C42D6.5030204@cfit.ie>
To: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, Janina Sajka <janina@a11y.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

Hi Gez,
> I think the confusion arises from the phrase, "This seems to some
> degree to be unfounded". Concerns about cyclic references causing
> problems in implementations are either founded or unfounded. 

Yes, and apologies for poor wording on my part. I am suggesting that
this may be a non-issue.

Cheers

Josh
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 18:39:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:27 GMT