Also sprach Elliotte Harold: > It's an interesting idea, and might even work (though I'm skeptical) but > it very much raises the bar for implementing parsers, and is contrary to > the design of XML at a very deep level. In essence, it is a fundamental > rejection of one of the core values of XML. It is the polar opposite of > draconian error handling. Yes. Draconian error handling was a mistake; it punishes users and rewards implementations that break the standard. A simple error recovery mechinanism would have made XML web-friendly and the world would, possibly, have been different. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcomeReceived on Monday, 17 November 2008 07:53:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:24 GMT