On Nov 16, 2008, at 11:33, Ben Millard wrote: > Henri Sivonen wrote: >> I don't have a suggestion for a term that would mean both HTML >> documents and XHTML documents collectively. > > Would "hypertext document" be alright? Or would that include too much? As a general term, it would include too much. Of course, the spec could give a special narrow meaning to a more general term within the spec, but it might confuse more than help. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Sunday, 16 November 2008 09:39:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:24 GMT