W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2008

Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:53:49 +0100
Message-ID: <492C117D.5040502@gmx.de>
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
CC: public-html@w3.org

Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Finally, I'd probably choose a less generic term, such as "AUDITNAV" 
>> or something like that; must people understand "ping" as something 
>> different.
> What about simply using AUDIT, or something like NOTIFY or INFORM?

All of these are better.

And, as somebody suggested on IRC, even TRACK may work (as it already 
has the property to be defunct in XHR, which I guess is desirable here).

BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 14:54:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:39 UTC