Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification

Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Finally, I'd probably choose a less generic term, such as "AUDITNAV" 
>> or something like that; must people understand "ping" as something 
>> different.
> 
> What about simply using AUDIT, or something like NOTIFY or INFORM?

All of these are better.

And, as somebody suggested on IRC, even TRACK may work (as it already 
has the property to be defunct in XHR, which I guess is desirable here).

BR, Julian