- From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:45:31 +0000
- To: jonas@sicking.cc
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Jonas Sicking wrote: > IMHO all the parts about elements and attributes need to be in the > HTML spec. Content-Style-Type definitely needs to be in the HTML spec, > otherwise you have no idea how to interpret the text inside the > <style> element. I.e. you couldn't let CSS define that since you > couldn't know that it's CSS that you're trying to interpret. Actually, to be pedantic, Content-Style-Type is needed to interpret the style *attribute*. The <style> element has a type attribute that tells you how to interpret it. Content-Style-Type is also IIRC defined to default to "text/css", so it's only needed by pages that use another stylesheet language. As few browsers support non-CSS styling languages, it is mostly redundant. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 13:46:23 UTC