annotations was Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003
XML language subset
Typo in Guide (Feb. 3 version)
Review of Overview (Overeview?): part 1 of 2
[Fwd: Review of Reference Document]
Review of Overview document
OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon
pls use 3 Feb 2003 for title page date of test/guide/ov/sem/req WDs
MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003
Annotations and non-mon example
- Re: Annotations and non-mon example
- Re: Annotations and non-mon example
- RE: Annotations and non-mon example
sameClassAs vs. sameMembersAs
Fwd: WG: Review of Reference Document
Regrets 30-Jan
Regrets for Jan. 30
regrets 1/30
Review of OWL Overview
ADMIN: Agenda amendment for Jan 30
Name change for sameClassAs
OWL DL and OWL Lite Syntax
(resend) OWL DL and OWL Lite Syntax
annotations - proposed solution
ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics Jan 30 (updated)
on OWL test cases: good stuff, one CRITICAL change request
Re: rdfms-assertion and webont
ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics - Jan 30 telecon
probable regrets for thurs
The Ugly Test
30 jan telecon regrets
'propertyValue' in the Abstract Syntax
Guide Action: add "everything in Lite needs a type" to Guide
ISSUE: annotations
ISSUE: OWL DL syntax
ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang
OWL and Web services descriptions
XSLT transformation from OWL XML to OWL RDF
XSLT: default namespace problem
[re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear
- [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear
XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear
semantics, list for later
Re: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases Editors Working Draft 23 January 2003
question: datatype reasoning?
- RE: question: datatype reasoning?
- RE: question: datatype reasoning?
- RE: question: datatype reasoning?
- RE: question: datatype reasoning?
- Re: question: datatype reasoning?
WOWG: Calendar issues
Minutes of January 23rd telecon
Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases Editors Working Draft 23 January 2003
ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification
- Re: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification
- RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification
- Re: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification
- RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification
- RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification
- RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification
- RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification
Belated regrets for 23-Jan-03
Regrets 1/23 telecon
March W3C tech plenary, SemWeb arch ftf
AS & S Review: overview
AS & S Review: Appendix A.1: Correspondence between Abstract OWL and OWL DL
AS&S more comments
WOWG: Agenda Jan 23 telecon (revised)
AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS)
- Re: AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS)
- Re: AS&S and WG consensus
- RE: AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS)
Reference, beginnings of HP review?
migrating from DAML+OIL to OWL?
Attribution in the Web Ont documents
- Re: Attribution in the Web Ont documents
- RE: Attribution in the Web Ont documents
- Re: Attribution in the Web Ont documents
TEST: cvs updates
Keeping Peter happy
late arrival at 1/23 telecon
XML Schema 1.1 Requirements
Guide: Last Call Candidate
WOWG: Ahenda Jan 23 telecon
implementability + HP last call position
GUIDE review
Reference doc: cleanup version
agenda request
Reference, Overview, Guide intersectionOf is in OWL Lite
regrets for last part of telecon 23 January
ASS substantive: abstract and concrete syntax
WOWG: f2f4 picts (better late than never)
desc of OWL Lite and OWL DL in RDF graph
cultural meaning -was- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
Requirements Document: Last Call Version?
OWL Reference: new version
FYI: IBM aims to get smart about AI (fwd)
Review of mapping rules and informal description
roadmap?
Entailments and normativity
an update to Overview/Feature Synopsis
feature synopsis/overview update
TEST: moving from PROPOSED to APPROVED
abstract syntax and RDFS
Short version of Test
Test document for review
OWL_DL_Lite_graphs
[www-webont-wg] <none>
Annotations and entailments
- Re: Annotations and entailments
- Re: Annotations and entailments
- Re: Annotations and entailments
- RE: Annotations and entailments
- RE: Annotations and entailments
RE: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
RE: Minutes WEBONT January 16, 2003 (correction)
AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics
- Re: AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics
- Re: AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics
- Re: AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics
owl:Class in class expressions - substantive
datarange too hard to use
Guide glossary
issues to be resolved before last call
- RE: issues to be resolved before last call
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion)
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call
- Re: issues to be resolved before last call
migrating RDF(S) to OWL Lite
problems with RDF datatyping
Guide: New version
initial OWL glossary
Minutes WEBONT January 16, 2003 Phone conference - HTML also Atta ched
Issue: Request support for adding a new unique name in a collection
Regrets for Jan. 16 teleconf
Regrets for 16-Jan-03
15 mins late today
IRC Challenged Scribe for Today's WebOnt Telecon
- Re: IRC Challenged Scribe for Today's WebOnt Telecon
- Re: IRC Challenged Scribe for Today's WebOnt Telecon
Semantics: References
Jim Hendler cannot send mail - pls use preliminary agenda
Re: AS & S review
preliminary agenda - Jan 16 telecon
Re: Update semantics LCC
Regrets 16th Jan
TEST: new editors draft URL
Sublanguages?
OWL Lite/OWL DL/OWL Full defn in AS&S
AS & S cannot be viewed/printed with Internet Explorer 6.0
- Re: AS & S cannot be viewed/printed with Internet Explorer 6.0
- Re: AS & S cannot be viewed/printed with Internet Explorer 6.0
AS & S review: OWL DL as RDF graphs
Re: Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review / Review of Semantics
regrets 1/16
Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review
- Re: Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review
- RE: Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review
Regrets for Jan. 16
TEST: example cases in miscellaneous
Consistency Checker
HP reactions to AS&S and OWL
- Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL
- Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL
- Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL
- Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL
- Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL
IRC logs for Friday
AS & S review: mapping to RDF graphs
AS & S review: Direct model-theoretic semantics
AS & S review: Abstract, Introduction, Abstract Syntax
TEST: slippage
XML Schemas/XSL translation
name change for requirements document?
Guide: treatment of deprecation
Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S)
- Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S)
- Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S)
- Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S)
- Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S)
Roadmap: one more thing
AllDifferent
deprecation causes Fullness?
Deprecated class/property
Editors: consistent use of terms in webont docs
- Re: Editors: consistent use of terms in webont docs
- notes on the use of ``object'' (NB: needs discussion at the telecon today)
- Re: Editors: consistent use of terms in webont docs
comments on ASS
new version of AS&S
OWL for OWL
Issue 5.18 (unique name assumption)
how rdfs:Literal problems affect OWL semantics
notes from semantics document breakout session
Re: Notes from Editors Breakout [UML/XML presentation syntax]
Re: ADMIN: telecon dates through f2f
Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.)
- question about less technicality/dumbing down (was Re: Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.))
- Re: Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.)
- Re: Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.)
OWL datatyping and example
ICSE Workshop on Requirements Engineering in Open Systems
Update: XML presentation syntax (Appendix E of OWL Reference)
Review of Semantics Documnt
Agenda addition, f2f
Guide: New version
'cardinality' attribute in Presentation Syntax
IndividualRestriction vs. ObjectRestriction [wording in Presentation Syntax]
Status: Guide, Reference, Semantics tags
Mapping rules bug-ette and fix?
TEST: document issues for f2f
Re: LANG: Defn of DL in Mappings
Last call for reference?
ACTION report: XSLT transformation from OWL XML to OWL RDF
Reference: SameAs vs SameClassAs
Reference - editors' list
OWL documents and OWL ontologies
wine.owl, food.owl and namespaces
RE: ADMIN: minutes of Jan 2 telecon - Cross linking documents
Re: Review of Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases
Explicit Constraint on SubPropertyOf in Presentation Syntax
- Re: Explicit Constraint on SubPropertyOf in Presentation Syntax
- Re: Explicit Constraint on SubPropertyOf in Presentation Syntax
ADMIN: minutes of Jan 2 telecon
Guide: New version available.
RE: Guide review
Semantics Wrinkle
Conformance was Re: apologies and TEST update
- Re: Conformance was Re: apologies and TEST update
- Re: Conformance was Re: apologies and TEST update
- Re: Conformance was Re: apologies and TEST update
RE: review of Guide (clarificatons)
typo in Abstract Syntax ?
RE: Review of Reference (syntax reference? no)
problems with RDF literals
XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType)
- Re: XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType)
- Re: XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType)
- Re: XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType)
OWL Reference for F2F 5
OWL Lite vs OWL/Lite; OWL DL vs OWL/DL; OWL Full vs. OWL/Full
update to the feature synopsis document
status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files''
apologies and TEST update
F2F Version of Requirements Document
Mapping rules Jan 2nd
intersectionOf in OWL Lite
Review of Reference
Re: Feature Synopsis Review
OWL Semantics now has a vocabulary index
Review of Guide
OWL Reference: Appendix E (XML Presentation Syntax)
Re: Reference document: a review
RE: Registration page for the Manchester WebOnt meeting
Re: Abstract Syntax and Semantics: review comments / Correspondence between OWL DL and OWL Full
RE: Suntax comments on the Guide document
RE: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
Re: Suntax comments on the Guide document
Re: OWL/DL in RDF graphs
Review of Guide
document question: theoretical properties of OWL sublanguages
Review of Semantics Documnt
Comments on Feature Synopsis
Re: Semantic Review (reference process question)
review of Reference Document
Re: Action: Review of satisfaction of requirements
ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?
- RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set?