- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 22:57:17 -0600
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: "Smith, Michael K" <michael.smith@eds.com>, Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Deborah McGuinness <dlm@KSL.Stanford.EDU>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>, webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 20:46, Jim Hendler wrote: > WOWG document editors - after spending some time poring over the W3C > process/manual/guide and looking at past LC and Rec documents, Guus > and I have decided that we like what RDF Core did with respect to > editing/authorship and would like to have our group follow this model. FYI, RDF was following a reasonably old IETF/W3C tradition here. While doing a random fly-by of the IESG queue, I happened across this closely related draft. I found it pretty interesting: RFC Editor Guidelines on Author Lists 8 May 2002 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfc-editor-author-lists-00.txt -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:57:53 UTC