- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:37:43 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 07:01, Guus Schreiber wrote: > >>When running the new examples in the Reference through ouur parser [1] I >>discovered many small errors. Sorry for not checking that before >>distributing. My Emacs cut-and-pasting worked poorly. I have attached >>the cleaned-up version. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/att-0365/01-owl-ref-v151.html#Header > > > At a glance, I still find it hard to reconcile statements like this... > > "Thus any RDF graph forms an OWL ontology." > > which appeals to me, with this... > > "An OWL ontology consists of an optional ontology header and any number > of class axioms, property axioms, and individual axioms." > > which seems to be talking about an ontology as if it were > a piece of XML syntax. Slip of the pen. I replaced "OWL ontology" with "OWL document"m, which was what I actually meant. . > Is an ontology header a part of the RDF graph? > > Hmm... > > "A ontology header component is represented with an instance of the > class owl:Ontology" > > Maybe I could get used to that. > > But this bit is wrong/overly-constraining: > > "which identifies the containing document". > > I suggest changing to > which typically identifies the containing document. > > or even... > > which typically identifies the containg document > using a same-document reference [section 4.2 > of RFC2396]. Changed as suggested. Guus > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt > > >>Mike will place it soon at its regular editor's draft spot. >> >>Guus >> >>[1] http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/projects/SWI-Prolog/packages/sgml/online.html > > -- A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam, http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2003 09:44:52 UTC