- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 23:31:10 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
The mapping rules from OWL Lite in the abstract syntax to triples incldue the single following rule using intersectionOf: Class(<classID> complete <annotation1> … <annotationn> <description1> … <descriptionn>) ==> <classID> rdf:type owl:Class . <classID> T(<annotation1>) . … <classID> T(<annotationn>) . <classID> owl:sameClassAs _:x . _:x owl:intersectionOf T(SEQ <description1>…<descriptionn>) . I suggest a change to the semanticly equivalent rule: Class(<classID> complete <annotation1> … <annotationn> <description1> … <descriptionn>) ==> <classID> rdf:type owl:Class . <classID> T(<annotation1>) . … <classID> T(<annotationn>) . <classID> owl:intersectionOf T(SEQ <description1>…<descriptionn>) . This can then be more easily articulated (in for example features, guide, reference) as: [[ In OWL Lite a class can be declared as the intersectionOf other classes and/or restrictions. ]] (Contrasting with the less restricted use in OWL DL). Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 17:33:05 UTC