Re: AS&S and WG consensus

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Subject: Re: AS&S and WG consensus
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 08:48:28 -0600

[...]

> > > - a last call WD and candidate, proposed and full recommendations should
> > > correctly reflect WG consensus. Ensuring this is the case is primarily the
> > > editors' responsibility.
> > 
> > Agreed, and thus I have taken rdfs:comment and rdfs:label out.
> 
> "thus"? What WG decision do you trace that to?

Well, I added them (yesterday) without any WG decision, so all I'm doing is
undoing this unsupported change, resulting in no change here from the
previous working draft version of the document.

[...]


peter

Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 10:04:30 UTC