Re: [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear

Should we think about allowing additional metadata (.e.g., DC and TopicMap)
into arbitrary position of an OWL document?  Or, is it sufficient to allow
the inclusion of additional metadata in the header section of OWL?

If the inclusion only in the header is ok, we may introduce 'owls:Head'
(correspond to 'owl:Ontology' in RDF/XML) and allow arbitrary well-formed
XML fragments as children of the owls:Head in addition to the owls:Import
and other versioning elements (see also the last part of [1]).

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0464.html

-Masahiro

Masahiro Hori, Ph.D.
Group Leader, Programming Models & Tools,
IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory
Tel: +81-46-215-4667 / Fax: +81-46-274-4282
Email: horim@jp.ibm.com


                                                                                                                  
                      Jerome.Euzenat@in                                                                           
                      rialpes.fr               To:       Masahiro Hori/Japan/IBM@IBMJP                            
                      (Jerome Euzenat)         cc:       www-webont-wg@w3.org                                     
                      Sent by:                 Subject:  [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear 
                      www-webont-wg-req                                                                           
                      uest@w3.org                                                                                 
                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                  
                      2003/01/26 03:56                                                                            
                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                  




Hello,

In his message ([re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation
unclea) of 24/01/2003,
Masahiro Hori wrote:
>I will fix this neatly by importing (in the XML Schema
>sense) the DC metadata Schema [1] into the presentation
>syntax Schema.
>
>[1] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/

I am not sure that this is the more adequate approach. As I said a
few month ago, why dc and not any other notation (e.g., a couple of
XML Topic Maps statements)?

(of course, I do not help to solve the initial problem).
We already spend a large part of the stylesheet to transform this
annotation information!


--
  Jérôme Euzenat                  __
                                  /      /\
  INRIA Rhône-Alpes,            _/  _   _   _ _    _
                               /_) | ` / ) | \ \  /_)
  655, avenue de l'Europe,    (___/___(_/_/  / /_(_________________
  Montbonnot St Martin,       /        http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
  38334 Saint-Ismier cedex,  /          Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
  France____________________/                Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr

Received on Sunday, 26 January 2003 15:30:02 UTC