- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 01 Jan 2003 14:28:12 -0600
- To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
- Cc: WebOnt <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 14:57, Jeff Heflin wrote: > I have reviewed the requirements from the Req Doc [1] with respect to > our current language. Most of the requirements are definitely satisfied, > however there is one that isn't and two that probably are (but I'd like > a second opinion). > > R5. Ontology metadata is not satisfied. No? > It essentially requires specific > meta-data properties such as author, publish date, etc. Which are already available in the dublin core. We satisfied R5 by integrating OWL into the Resource Description Framework in such a way that we get these properties for free. > I would have no > problem demoting this to an objective if the WG agrees. No, I don't agree. > The two probably supported are: > > R19. Supporting a character model > > and > > R20. Supporting a uniqueness of Unicode strings > > I think we get these for free with XML, likewise we get R5 for free with RDF (and dublin core). > but would like to make sure we > didn't have something else in mind when we added them. If you feel they > are not currently supported, please let me know. > > Jeff > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 2003 15:28:09 UTC