- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:30:18 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Hi: What is the status of http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema Are they normative parts of the RDF specifications? I don't see how, because 1/ Neither of them are valid in the RDF Model Theory or the RDFS model theory. 2/ http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns does not have elements that correspond to all the elements of the RDF namespace. If they are not normative, what is their status? One reason that I ask is that WebOnt has a similar sort of document http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl with some of the same problems, but because of owl:imports the actual contents of the document matters more. In fact, owl:imports makes the contents of http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema matter more. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 22:30:26 UTC