- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:59:27 +0100
- To: "Frank van Harmelen" <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
There are some bugs, some serious - I need to make more comments on the AS&S in order to resolve them. Particular problems are: ?? rdf:type rdf:Property . and ?? rdf:type rdfs:Class . are never legal OWL DL or OWL Lite; hence all RDFS schemas are necessairly OWL Full (including owl.owl). Also trying to understand or describe the annotations part of the AS&S is very difficult and I did not succeed. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: www-webont-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-webont-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Frank van Harmelen > Sent: 19 January 2003 00:13 > To: www-webont-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: migrating RDF(S) to OWL Lite > > > > > > > At 12:10 +0100 1/17/03, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > > Hopefully, it is still possible for the Guide editors to > do something > > > > with this before publication; if it is too late, so be it. > > I find your write up very important and useful. > It is a crucial step-in procedure for any current Semantic Web > applications > that might want to upgrade from RDFS to OWL. > Should we consider including it as an appendix to our dust-bin document > (it's seems excessively long as part of a FAQ). > > Frank. > ---- > >
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 03:59:45 UTC