- From: <herman.ter.horst@philips.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:37:51 +0100
- To: jjc@hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, pfps@research.bell-labs.com
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 06:39:59 UTC
A few comments from reading parts of the Test cases document just before the f2f meeting in Manchester. The first comment actually requires a change in the Abstract Syntax and Semantics document. - Sections 3.4 and 3.5 refer to the notion of consistency "as defined by the OWL Semantics [reference AS & S]". However, consistency is not explicitly defined in the Semantics document: its definition should be added to that document. - The readability of the test cases (I looked at the triples versions in section E) would improve if one very strictly followed way of writing them would be used. Sometimes, in particular, a long list of conclusions incorporates many premises. I am in favor of consistently dropping all premises from the conclusions, in view of readability. - Section 4 speaks about "inferences" (two times). It would be better to speak of entailments everywhere, since this is what is defined in the semantics document. - Section 2.2:"the errata process over the tests is monotonic decreasing". I can make an interpretation of this sentence, but believe that this should be described somewhat more extensively. - 6.1.3 typo: than should be then Herman ter Horst Philips Research
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 06:39:59 UTC