- From: Jerome Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:49:13 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>, WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Hello, I sent this message this morning but it did not get through. So, the resent following Guus message. At 13:02 -0500 29/01/2003, Jim Hendler wrote: >3.1 Name change on "owl:sameClassAs" (Guus Schreiber) > >Several people have suggested changing the name of sameClassAs to >sameMembersAs or some other term more clearly suggesting the >extensional nature of this construct. The name of the constructors should be based on the "intension" and not the "extension". I would even rephrase this in a more defined way: the constructors are syntactic units and their name should not be based on the interpretation of the terms. The _interpretation_ of sameClassAs is the equality of the interpretion of its arguments (and thus the equality of the extension of the classes). This is not something special for sameClassAs but applies to any constructors. So, if we want to reconsider the name of sameClassAs, we should also do it for the relations and the individuals. Then the same reasons will lead to reformulating the same...As into something closer to the interpretation, what about: sameSetOfTupplesAs( relation, relation ) ? Even if a Class is given by enumeration (oneOf), this is still a syntactic unit expressed as a set but this set is not the interpretation of that Class (the interpretation is, often, a set of the interpretation of the individuals). Then when you write: sameClassAs( oneOf( a, b ), class( ... ) ) you are still manipulating syntax, and the class description is not its interpretation (or extension?). If people are disturbed by writing intersectionOf(Class,unionOf( Class, Class)) I would sugest to come back to: and(Class, or( Class, Class )) [or, less easy, conjunctionOf( Class, disjunctionOf( Class, Class ))] -- Jérôme Euzenat __ / /\ INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _ /_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_) 655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________ Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo 38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 11:57:18 UTC