www-webont-wg@w3.org from January 2003 by date

Friday, 31 January 2003

• RE: Annotations and non-mon example Jos De_Roo
• RE: Annotations and non-mon example Jim Hendler
• Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Jim Hendler
• RE: XML language subset Stanton, John
• Re: annotations was Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• annotations was Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XML language subset Dan Connolly
• XML language subset Christopher Welty
• Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Dan Connolly
• Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Jim Hendler
• RE: Annotations and non-mon example Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [Fwd: Review of Reference Document] Jim Hendler
• Re: Annotations and non-mon example Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: The Ugly Test Jeremy Carroll
• Typo in Guide (Feb. 3 version) Masahiro Hori
• Re: [Fwd: Review of Reference Document] Ian Horrocks
• Re: The Ugly Test Jos De_Roo
• RE: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
• Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Mike Dean

Thursday, 30 January 2003

• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jim Hendler
• Review of Overview (Overeview?): part 1 of 2 Christopher Welty
• [Fwd: Review of Reference Document] Dan Connolly
• Review of Overview document Jim Hendler
• Re: on OWL test cases: good stuff, one CRITICAL change request Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Annotations and non-mon example Dan Connolly
• OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Jim Hendler
• pls use 3 Feb 2003 for title page date of test/guide/ov/sem/req WDs Dan Connolly
• MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Smith, Michael K
• Annotations and non-mon example Jeremy Carroll
• sameClassAs vs. sameMembersAs Jerome Euzenat
• Fwd: WG: Review of Reference Document Jim Hendler
• Re: Name change for sameClassAs Jerome Euzenat
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Ian Horrocks
• Regrets 30-Jan Jonathan Dale
• Regrets for Jan. 30 Masahiro Hori
• regrets 1/30 Leo Obrst
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
• (Correction) Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
• Review of OWL Overview Bernard Horan
• Re: annotations - proposed solution Dan Connolly
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics Jan 30 (updated) Frank van Harmelen
• ADMIN: Agenda amendment for Jan 30 Jim Hendler
• Name change for sameClassAs Guus Schreiber
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics Jan 30 (updated) Jeremy Carroll
• OWL DL and OWL Lite Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• (resend) OWL DL and OWL Lite Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• annotations - proposed solution Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jim Hendler
• ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics Jan 30 (updated) Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Deborah McGuinness
• on OWL test cases: good stuff, one CRITICAL change request Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 29 January 2003

• RE: question: datatype reasoning? Ian Horrocks
• Re: question: datatype reasoning? Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Jim Hendler
• Re: question: datatype reasoning? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: rdfms-assertion and webont Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Ian Horrocks
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics - Jan 30 telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review of Semantics Documnt Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics - Jan 30 telecon Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Ian Horrocks
• Re: 'propertyValue' in the Abstract Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: The Ugly Test Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 28 January 2003

• Re: The Ugly Test Jos De_Roo
• Re: Guide Action: add "everything in Lite needs a type" to Guide Christopher Welty
• probable regrets for thurs Deborah McGuinness
• RE: question: datatype reasoning? Jeremy Carroll
• The Ugly Test Jeremy Carroll
• 30 jan telecon regrets herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Reference doc: cleanup version Guus Schreiber
• 'propertyValue' in the Abstract Syntax Masahiro Hori
• Re: Guide Action: add "everything in Lite needs a type" to Guide Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Jim Hendler

Monday, 27 January 2003

• Guide Action: add "everything in Lite needs a type" to Guide Christopher Welty
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Review of Semantics Documnt Jeff Z. Pan
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Dan Connolly
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Dan Connolly
• ISSUE: annotations Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE: OWL DL syntax Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WOWG: Calendar issues Ian Horrocks
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Ian Horrocks
• Re: [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Masahiro Hori

Sunday, 26 January 2003

• FW: Re: OWL and Web services descriptions Charlie Abela
• Re: OWL and Web services descriptions sam@ksl.Stanford.EDU
• Re: [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Dan Brickley
• Re: [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Masahiro Hori
• OWL and Web services descriptions Charlie Abela
• Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Jeremy Carroll
• [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Jerome Euzenat

Saturday, 25 January 2003

• [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Jerome Euzenat

Friday, 24 January 2003

• RE: question: datatype reasoning? Jim Hendler
• RE: question: datatype reasoning? Ian Horrocks
• RE: question: datatype reasoning? Jeremy Carroll
• XSLT transformation from OWL XML to OWL RDF Jerome Euzenat
• XSLT: default namespace problem Jerome Euzenat
• RE: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases Editors Working Draft 23 January 2003 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS) Smith, Michael K
• Re: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases Editors Working Draft 23 January 2003 Dan Connolly
• [re-send] Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Masahiro Hori
• Re: XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Masahiro Hori
• Migration from RDSF to OWL was: Re: AS&S and WG consensus Jonathan Borden
• RE: question: datatype reasoning? Peter Crowther
• RE: question: datatype reasoning? Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL datatyping and example Jeff Z. Pan
• RE: AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS) Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 23 January 2003

• XSLT: status of owls:Documentation unclear Jerome Euzenat

Friday, 24 January 2003

• RE: WOWG: Calendar issues Jeremy Carroll
• RE: question: datatype reasoning? Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Jeremy Carroll
• semantics, list for later Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases Editors Working Draft 23 January 2003 Jeremy Carroll
• belated regrets 1/23 telecon Jonathan Borden
• Re: AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS) Jonathan Borden
• question: datatype reasoning? Jim Hendler
• WOWG: Calendar issues Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 23 January 2003

• Re: AS&S and WG consensus Jim Hendler
• Minutes of January 23rd telecon Jim Hendler
• Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases Editors Working Draft 23 January 2003 Jos De_Roo
• ISSUE 5.2 Language Compliance Levels - proposed clarification Jeremy Carroll
• Belated regrets for 23-Jan-03 Jonathan Dale
• Re: Attribution in the Web Ont documents Mike Dean
• RE: Attribution in the Web Ont documents Smith, Michael K
• Re: Reference, beginnings of HP review? Guus Schreiber
• RE: migrating from DAML+OIL to OWL? Smith, Michael K
• Regrets 1/23 telecon Stanton, John
• Re: Minutes WEBONT January 16, 2003 Phone conference - HTML also Atta ched Dan Connolly
• Re: Reference doc: cleanup version Dan Connolly
• RE: AS&S and WG consensus Jeremy Carroll
• March W3C tech plenary, SemWeb arch ftf Dan Connolly
• Re: roadmap? Christopher Welty
• Re: AS&S and WG consensus Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS&S and WG consensus Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS&S and WG consensus Dan Connolly
• Re: AS&S and WG consensus Jim Hendler
• AS & S Review: overview herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Reference, beginnings of HP review? Brian McBride
• AS & S Review: Appendix A.1: Correspondence between Abstract OWL and OWL DL herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: abstract syntax and RDFS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Reference reference? Mike Dean
• Re: AS&S and WG consensus Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• RE: AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS) Jeremy Carroll
• Reference reference? Jim Hendler
• Re: AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS) Jonathan Borden
• AS&S more comments Jeremy Carroll
• RE: AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics Jeremy Carroll
• RE: abstract syntax and RDFS Jeremy Carroll
• RE: OWL_DL_Lite_graphs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: owl:Class in class expressions - substantive Guus Schreiber
• RE: abstract syntax and RDFS Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Reference, beginnings of HP review? Guus Schreiber
• RE: owl:Class in class expressions - substantive Jeremy Carroll
• WOWG: Agenda Jan 23 telecon (revised) Guus Schreiber
• AS&S and WG consensus (was Re: abstract syntax and RDFS) Jeremy Carroll
• Reference, beginnings of HP review? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: migrating from DAML+OIL to OWL? Mike Dean
• Re: Attribution in the Web Ont documents Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: cvs updates Jim Hendler
• migrating from DAML+OIL to OWL? Christopher Welty
• Re: WOWG: Ahenda Jan 23 telecon Ian Horrocks
• Re: abstract syntax and RDFS Jim Hendler
• Attribution in the Web Ont documents Jim Hendler
• Re: owl:Class in class expressions - substantive Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: abstract syntax and RDFS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: abstract syntax and RDFS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL_DL_Lite_graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: migrating RDF(S) to OWL Lite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 22 January 2003

• Re: TEST: cvs updates Jos De_Roo
• TEST: cvs updates Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WOWG: Ahenda Jan 23 telecon Jim Hendler
• Re: Keeping Peter happy Jos De_Roo
• Keeping Peter happy Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WOWG: Ahenda Jan 23 telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• late arrival at 1/23 telecon Leo Obrst
• Re: Review of Guide Jeff Heflin
• XML Schema 1.1 Requirements Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XSLT: datatype problems (*) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: OWL Reference: new version Smith, Michael K
• Guide: Last Call Candidate Smith, Michael K
• Re: OWL Reference: new version Mike Dean
• Re: WOWG: Ahenda Jan 23 telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: possibly late to telecon 23 January Evan Wallace
• RE: OWL Reference: new version Smith, Michael K
• Re: XSLT: datatype problems (*) Jerome Euzenat
• WOWG: Ahenda Jan 23 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: XSLT: datatype problems (*) Jerome Euzenat
• Re: XSLT: datatype problems (*) Mike Dean
• RE: Review of Guide Smith, Michael K
• XSLT: datatype problems (*) Jerome Euzenat
• Re: implementability + HP last call position Jim Hendler
• Re: owl:Class in class expressions - substantive Guus Schreiber
• RE: Guide glossary Smith, Michael K
• implementability + HP last call position Jeremy Carroll
• GUIDE review Guus Schreiber
• Reference doc: cleanup version Guus Schreiber
• agenda request Jeremy Carroll
• Reference, Overview, Guide intersectionOf is in OWL Lite Jeremy Carroll
• possibly late to telecon 23 January Jeremy Carroll
• regrets for last part of telecon 23 January herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• ASS substantive: abstract and concrete syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• WOWG: f2f4 picts (better late than never) Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 21 January 2003

• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Jos De_Roo
• desc of OWL Lite and OWL DL in RDF graph Jeremy Carroll
• cultural meaning -was- Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Evan Wallace
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Dan Brickley
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: What sublanguage is allDifferent in? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Jos De_Roo
• What sublanguage is allDifferent in? Deborah McGuinness
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL Reference: new version Mike Dean
• Requirements Document: Last Call Version? Jeff Heflin
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Jim Hendler
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• OWL Reference: new version Guus Schreiber
• FYI: IBM aims to get smart about AI (fwd) Frank van Harmelen
• Re: roadmap? Frank van Harmelen
• Review of Guide Jeff Heflin
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Evan Wallace
• RE: Short version of Test Smith, Michael K
• Re: TEST: moving from PROPOSED to APPROVED Jos De_Roo
• Re: TEST: moving from PROPOSED to APPROVED Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Entailments and normativity Jim Hendler
• Re: Entailments and normativity Jos De_Roo
• Re: abstract syntax and RDFS Jim Hendler
• Re: roadmap? Mike Dean
• Review of mapping rules and informal description Jeremy Carroll
• roadmap? Jeremy Carroll
• Entailments and normativity Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Test document for review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: abstract syntax and RDFS Jeremy Carroll
• an update to Overview/Feature Synopsis Deborah McGuinness
• feature synopsis/overview update Deborah McGuinness

Monday, 20 January 2003

• TEST: moving from PROPOSED to APPROVED Jos De_Roo
• Re: abstract syntax and RDFS Guus Schreiber
• Re: abstract syntax and RDFS Jeremy Carroll
• abstract syntax and RDFS Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Test document for review Jim Hendler
• Short version of Test Jeremy Carroll
• Test document for review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Jim Hendler
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call Jim Hendler
• OWL_DL_Lite_graphs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• RE: migrating RDF(S) to OWL Lite Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 19 January 2003

• Re: Annotations and entailments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Annotations and entailments Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Annotations and entailments Peter Crowther
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Annotations and entailments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Jos De_Roo

Saturday, 18 January 2003

• RE: migrating RDF(S) to OWL Lite Frank van Harmelen
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Annotations and entailments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Jeremy Carroll
• [www-webont-wg] <none> Lynn Andrea Stein
• Re: Annotations and entailments Jos De_Roo
• Annotations and entailments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Dan Brickley
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Jos De_Roo
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Christopher Welty
• RE: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Peter Crowther

Friday, 17 January 2003

• Re: Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review Dan Connolly
• RE: migrating RDF(S) to OWL Lite Jim Hendler
• RE: Minutes WEBONT January 16, 2003 (correction) Smith, Michael K
• Re: AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS & S review: Direct model-theoretic semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS & S review: Abstract, Introduction, Abstract Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AS & S review: RDFS-compatible OWL semantics herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Mapping rules bug-ette and fix? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call (rdfms-assertion) Dan Connolly
• owl:Class in class expressions - substantive Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Mapping rules bug-ette and fix? Jeremy Carroll
• datarange too hard to use Jeremy Carroll
• Guide glossary Bernard Horan
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: issues to be resolved before last call Lynn Andrea Stein
• RE: issues to be resolved before last call Jeremy Carroll
• RE: migrating RDF(S) to OWL Lite Christopher Welty
• issues to be resolved before last call Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: migrating RDF(S) to OWL Lite Jeremy Carroll
• migrating RDF(S) to OWL Lite Jeremy Carroll
• Re: initial OWL glossary Christopher Welty
• Re: Editors: consistent use of terms in webont docs Christopher Welty
• Re: AS & S review Christopher Welty
• problems with RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 16 January 2003

• Re: Semantics: References Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Guide: New version Smith, Michael K
• initial OWL glossary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Minutes WEBONT January 16, 2003 Phone conference - HTML also Atta ched Stanton, John
• Issue: Request support for adding a new unique name in a collection Deborah McGuinness
• Re: AS & S cannot be viewed/printed with Internet Explorer 6.0 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Update semantics LCC Brian McBride
• Re: IRC Challenged Scribe for Today's WebOnt Telecon Deborah McGuinness
• Regrets for Jan. 16 teleconf Masahiro Hori
• Regrets for 16-Jan-03 Jonathan Dale
• 15 mins late today Frank van Harmelen
• Re: IRC Challenged Scribe for Today's WebOnt Telecon Dan Connolly
• Re: IRC Challenged Scribe for Today's WebOnt Telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS & S cannot be viewed/printed with Internet Explorer 6.0 Dan Connolly
• IRC Challenged Scribe for Today's WebOnt Telecon Stanton, John
• RE: Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review Smith, Michael K
• Semantics: References Smith, Michael K
• Jim Hendler cannot send mail - pls use preliminary agenda Dan Brickley
• Re: preliminary agenda - Jan 16 telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL Jos De_Roo
• Re: AS & S cannot be viewed/printed with Internet Explorer 6.0 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Editors: consistent use of terms in webont docs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• notes on the use of ``object'' (NB: needs discussion at the telecon today) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Consistency Checker Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS & S review Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS & S cannot be viewed/printed with Internet Explorer 6.0 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL Lite/OWL DL/OWL Full defn in AS&S Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL Jos De_Roo

Wednesday, 15 January 2003

• Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL Jim Hendler
• preliminary agenda - Jan 16 telecon Jim Hendler
• Re: Update semantics LCC Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Regrets 16th Jan Jeremy Carroll
• TEST: new editors draft URL Jeremy Carroll
• Sublanguages? Jeremy Carroll
• OWL Lite/OWL DL/OWL Full defn in AS&S Jeremy Carroll
• Re: AS & S cannot be viewed/printed with Internet Explorer 6.0 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S) Jeremy Carroll
• AS & S cannot be viewed/printed with Internet Explorer 6.0 herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• AS & S review: OWL DL as RDF graphs herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review / Review of Semantics herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• regrets 1/16 Leo Obrst
• Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 14 January 2003

• Manchester WebOnt ftf meeting record: please review Dan Connolly
• Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL Jos De_Roo
• Re: AllDifferent Jos De_Roo
• Regrets for Jan. 16 Jeff Heflin
• Re: AllDifferent Jim Hendler
• Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL Jim Hendler
• Re: AllDifferent Jos De_Roo
• TEST: example cases in miscellaneous Jos De_Roo
• Re: Consistency Checker Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Consistency Checker Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Consistency Checker Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Consistency Checker Peter Crowther
• Consistency Checker Jeremy Carroll
• Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL Jim Hendler
• HP reactions to AS&S and OWL Jeremy Carroll
• IRC logs for Friday Jeremy Carroll
• AS & S review: mapping to RDF graphs herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• AS & S review: Direct model-theoretic semantics herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• AS & S review: Abstract, Introduction, Abstract Syntax herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• TEST: slippage Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: XML Schemas/XSL translation Masahiro Hori
• Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S) herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• XML Schemas/XSL translation Sean Bechhofer
• Re: Review of Semantics Documnt Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 13 January 2003

• Re: Guide: treatment of deprecation Jim Hendler
• Re: Deprecated class/property Mike Dean
• name change for requirements document? Jim Hendler
• Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Guide: treatment of deprecation Christopher Welty
• Re: GUIDE comment [was Re: comments on ASS] Christopher Welty
• Re: GUIDE comment [was Re: comments on ASS] Guus Schreiber
• GUIDE comment [was Re: comments on ASS] Guus Schreiber
• Re: comments on ASS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S) herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S) Jeremy Carroll
• Test document: a few comments (one comment about AS & S) herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: comments on ASS Guus Schreiber
• Roadmap: one more thing Christopher Welty
• Re: comments on ASS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: deprecation causes Fullness? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AllDifferent Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 12 January 2003

• deprecation causes Fullness? Christopher Welty
• Deprecated class/property Christopher Welty
• Re: Editors: consistent use of terms in webont docs Jim Hendler
• Guide question (OneOf) (was Re: OWL datatyping and example) Jim Hendler
• Editors: consistent use of terms in webont docs Christopher Welty
• comments on ASS Guus Schreiber
• new version of AS&S Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 11 January 2003

• OWL for OWL Jos De_Roo
• Issue 5.18 (unique name assumption) Jos De_Roo

Friday, 10 January 2003

• how rdfs:Literal problems affect OWL semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL datatyping and example Jerome Euzenat
• RE: Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.) Oscar Corcho
• notes from semantics document breakout session Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Notes from Editors Breakout [UML/XML presentation syntax] Masahiro Hori
• Re: ADMIN: telecon dates through f2f Deborah McGuinness
• Re: OWL datatyping and example Mike Dean

Thursday, 9 January 2003

• Re: OWL datatyping and example Jerome Euzenat
• Re: Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.) Jerome Euzenat

Friday, 10 January 2003

• Re: Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.) Frank van Harmelen

Thursday, 9 January 2003

• Re: question about less technicality/dumbing down (was Re: Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.)) Frank van Harmelen
• question about less technicality/dumbing down (was Re: Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.)) Deborah McGuinness
• Notes from Editors Breakout (by Chris W.) Jim Hendler
• Re: XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType) Masahiro Hori
• Re: XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType) Sean Bechhofer
• OWL datatyping and example Mike Dean
• Re: XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType) Sean Bechhofer

Wednesday, 8 January 2003

• ICSE Workshop on Requirements Engineering in Open Systems Christopher Welty
• Re: XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType) Masahiro Hori
• Update: XML presentation syntax (Appendix E of OWL Reference) Masahiro Hori
• RE: Guide: New version Smith, Michael K
• Re: Guide: New version Deborah McGuinness
• Re: Guide: New version Jerome Euzenat
• Review of Semantics Documnt Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType) Sean Bechhofer
• Agenda addition, f2f Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 7 January 2003

• Re: Guide Comment with respect to the Unique Names issue (5.18) Jos De_Roo
• Re: TEST: document issues for f2f Jos De_Roo
• Guide Comment with respect to the Unique Names issue (5.18) Deborah McGuinness
• Guide: New version Smith, Michael K
• 'cardinality' attribute in Presentation Syntax Masahiro Hori
• IndividualRestriction vs. ObjectRestriction [wording in Presentation Syntax] Masahiro Hori
• RE: Review of Guide Smith, Michael K
• Status: Guide, Reference, Semantics tags Smith, Michael K
• Mapping rules bug-ette and fix? Jeremy Carroll
• TEST: document issues for f2f Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Conformance was Re: apologies and TEST update Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Explicit Constraint on SubPropertyOf in Presentation Syntax Masahiro Hori
• Re: Conformance was Re: apologies and TEST update Jim Hendler

Monday, 6 January 2003

• Re: Conformance was Re: apologies and TEST update Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Jim Hendler
• Re: Review of Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Conformance was Re: apologies and TEST update Jim Hendler
• Re: LANG: Defn of DL in Mappings Jeremy Carroll
• Last call for reference? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ACTION report: XSLT transformation from OWL XML to OWL RDF Dan Connolly
• ACTION report: XSLT transformation from OWL XML to OWL RDF Jerome Euzenat
• Re: Review of Guide Jeff Heflin
• Re: Reference: SameAs vs SameClassAs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Reference - editors' list Dan Connolly
• Re: review of Guide (clarificatons) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Reference - editors' list Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Reference: SameAs vs SameClassAs Smith, Michael K
• RE: wine.owl, food.owl and namespaces Smith, Michael K
• Reference - editors' list Jeremy Carroll
• Re: apologies and TEST update Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Review of Reference Jeremy Carroll
• OWL documents and OWL ontologies Jerome Euzenat
• wine.owl, food.owl and namespaces Jerome Euzenat
• Re: Explicit Constraint on SubPropertyOf in Presentation Syntax Jerome Euzenat

Sunday, 5 January 2003

• RE: ADMIN: minutes of Jan 2 telecon - Cross linking documents Smith, Michael K
• Re: ADMIN: minutes of Jan 2 telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review of Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases Jos De_Roo
• Explicit Constraint on SubPropertyOf in Presentation Syntax Masahiro Hori
• ADMIN: minutes of Jan 2 telecon Jim Hendler

Saturday, 4 January 2003

• Guide: New version available. Smith, Michael K

Friday, 3 January 2003

• RE: Review of Guide Smith, Michael K
• Re: Semantics Wrinkle Dan Brickley
• RE: Guide review Smith, Michael K
• Semantics Wrinkle Jeremy Carroll
• Conformance was Re: apologies and TEST update Jeremy Carroll
• RE: review of Guide (clarificatons) Smith, Michael K
• Re: typo in Abstract Syntax ? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• Regrets for the jan 03 F2F Marwan Sabbouh
• typo in Abstract Syntax ? Masahiro Hori
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Review of Reference (syntax reference? no) Smith, Michael K
• problems with RDF literals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• Re: Review of Reference (syntax reference? no) Dan Connolly
• XML presentation syntax Schema (modification in AnnotationType) Masahiro Hori
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review of Reference (syntax reference? no) Jeff Heflin
• Re: Review of Reference Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• Re: Review of Reference Jeff Heflin
• Re: status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files'' Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Jos De_Roo
• Re: status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files'' Brian McBride
• Re: Review of Reference (syntax reference? no) Dan Connolly
• Re: status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files'' Dan Connolly
• Re: OWL Reference for F2F 5 Mike Dean
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• RE: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18 Dan Connolly
• OWL Reference for F2F 5 Mike Dean
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Jonathan Borden
• OWL Lite vs OWL/Lite; OWL DL vs OWL/DL; OWL Full vs. OWL/Full Deborah McGuinness
• update to the feature synopsis document Deborah McGuinness
• status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files'' Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review of Reference Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18 Christopher Welty
• RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• Re: apologies and TEST update Dan Connolly

Thursday, 2 January 2003

• Re: Review of Reference Jim Hendler
• Re: Mapping rules Jan 2nd Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: intersectionOf in OWL Lite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: apologies and TEST update Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Jim Hendler
• apologies and TEST update Jeremy Carroll
• F2F Version of Requirements Document Jeff Heflin
• Mapping rules Jan 2nd Jeremy Carroll
• intersectionOf in OWL Lite Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Review of Guide Jeff Heflin
• Review of Reference Jeff Heflin
• Re: Feature Synopsis Review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comments on Feature Synopsis Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Reference document: a review Jim Hendler
• Re: Review of Semantics Documnt Jim Hendler
• OWL Semantics now has a vocabulary index Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• Review of Guide Jeff Heflin
• OWL Reference: Appendix E (XML Presentation Syntax) Masahiro Hori
• RE: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Ziv Hellman
• Re: Reference document: a review herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Review of Semantics Documnt Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comments on Feature Synopsis Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Registration page for the Manchester WebOnt meeting Ziv Hellman
• Re: Abstract Syntax and Semantics: review comments / Correspondence between OWL DL and OWL Full Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on Feature Synopsis Jim Hendler
• Re: Review of Requirements Document Jeff Heflin
• Re: Comments on Feature Synopsis Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/logistics for Jan 2 telecon Jos De_Roo
• Re: Abstract Syntax and Semantics: review comments / Correspondence between OWL DL and OWL Full herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Jim Hendler
• RE: Suntax comments on the Guide document Smith, Michael K
• Re: Action: Review of satisfaction of requirements Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Jeff Heflin
• Re: Action: Review of satisfaction of requirements Jeff Heflin
• RE: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18 Smith, Michael K
• Re: Suntax comments on the Guide document Jerome Euzenat
• Re: Comments on Feature Synopsis Jim Hendler
• Re: Comments on Feature Synopsis Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL/DL in RDF graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL/DL in RDF graphs Jerome Euzenat
• Re: Comments on Feature Synopsis Deborah McGuinness
• Re: Review of Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/logistics for Jan 2 telecon Deborah McGuinness

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• Review of Guide Jim Hendler
• document question: theoretical properties of OWL sublanguages Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• Review of Semantics Documnt Jim Hendler
• Re: SEM: Layering bug Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Comments on Feature Synopsis Jim Hendler
• Re: Semantic Review (reference process question) Dan Connolly
• review of Reference Document Jim Hendler
• Re: Action: Review of satisfaction of requirements Dan Connolly
• ISSUE: owl:Class name misleading; try owl:Set? Dan Connolly
• Re: SEM: Layering bug Dan Connolly
• Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18 Dan Connolly
• Review of Requirements Document Jim Hendler
• ADMIN: Agenda/logistics for Jan 2 telecon Jim Hendler
• Re: review of Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: review of Guide Christopher Welty

Last message date: Friday, 31 January 2003 17:50:15 UTC