Re: Mapping rules Jan 2nd

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Mapping rules Jan 2nd
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 23:33:37 +0100

> 
> 
> Peter,
> 
> in the current version of mapping rules (getting better and better) 
> you say:
> 
> 
> [[
> An RDF graph is an OWL/DL graph if: 
> 1.
> 2.
> 3.
> 4.
> ]]
> 
> I did not see a condition that all restrictions had to be blank nodes.
> I have not worked through the more detailed conditions above that part.
> 
> Jeremy

A restriction that is not a blank node does not match with the definition
of a description here.  This would prevent the disjoint partition of the
triples of the graph that is needed in 3.

peter

Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 18:37:28 UTC