- From: Jerome Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:22:31 +0100
- To: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
In his message (Re: XSLT: datatype problems (*)) of 22/01/2003, Mike Dean wrote: > > The problem is that I have no example >> of expressing the oneOf parseType="collection" containing a set of >> litteral. > >An alternative might be to define your own XML Schema >enumeration type. This would have some consequence for OWL implementers in RDF that they should be able to understand it in order to do valid inference such that: IF PropertyConstraint( C, P, oneOf( "bla" ) ) PropertyConstraint( C, P, MinCardinality( 1 ) ) O rdf:type C THEN O P "bla". I do not think that it is a good idea to force users to master XML Schema for our need (note that it is not for extending OWL, just for stating that a value must belong to a particular set). -- Jérôme Euzenat __ / /\ INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _ /_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_) 655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________ Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo 38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 11:24:16 UTC