- From: Jerome Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:22:31 +0100
- To: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
In his message (Re: XSLT: datatype problems (*)) of 22/01/2003,
Mike Dean wrote:
> > The problem is that I have no example
>> of expressing the oneOf parseType="collection" containing a set of
>> litteral.
>
>An alternative might be to define your own XML Schema
>enumeration type.
This would have some consequence for OWL implementers in RDF that
they should be able to understand it in order to do valid inference
such that:
IF
PropertyConstraint( C, P, oneOf( "bla" ) )
PropertyConstraint( C, P, MinCardinality( 1 ) )
O rdf:type C
THEN
O P "bla".
I do not think that it is a good idea to force users to master XML
Schema for our need (note that it is not for extending OWL, just for
stating that a value must belong to a particular set).
--
Jérôme Euzenat __
/ /\
INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _
/_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_)
655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________
Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 11:24:16 UTC