Re: TEST: moving from PROPOSED to APPROVED

O Peter, that's actually quite easy, just print the latest draft
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Jan/att-0059/01-lcc.html
and all the XML and all the triples are in there
(associating the URIs in my mail to the "proposed by function"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Jan/att-0059/01-lcc.html#proposedRDFXMLByFunction
is straightforward and for the "proposed by issue" you have to do a lookup
in the issues list http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html
so maybe the URIs should be better in the document as well
Jeremy?)

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/


                                                                                                                        
                    "Peter F.                                                                                           
                    Patel-Schneider"          To:     Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA                        
                    <pfps@research.bell       cc:     www-webont-wg@w3.org                                              
                    -labs.com>                Subject:     Re: TEST: moving from PROPOSED to APPROVED                   
                                                                                                                        
                    2003-01-21 03:53 PM                                                                                 
                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                        




I would like to have an easy way of viewing the tests.  I'm not
particularly enthused by brining up each test in my browser, and then
having to do a ``View Source'' to see the test.

Could you please create a single HTML or text file that allows me to easily
view or print the tests?

Thanks,

peter

Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2003 10:53:36 UTC