- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 11:37:57 +0100
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
> Yes, well, to speak plainly, I expect that if you we forbidden to use the > terms "rdfs:seeAlso" and "rdfs:isDefinedBy" under penalty of > death, that you > would be able to design a long and productive life for yourself. Let's not > use the term "can't live with" too lightly, eh? :) you are right of course - (well, God willing). but I really do think I would vote against further progress of OWL along the recommendation track in some instances ... and the RDFS => OWL Lite migration is one of those showstopping issues for me (of course that might be an incorrect judgement, I am influenced by having worked on RDF developers kits and RDF standards; and HP has a greater RDF investment than say Description Logic investment). Jeremy
Received on Friday, 24 January 2003 05:38:14 UTC