- From: Jerome Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:41:11 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
- Cc: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
Hello, still no answer to my question so I insist a bit: In his message (Guide question (OneOf) (was Re: OWL datatyping and exam) of 12/01/2003, Jim Hendler wrote: >p.s. Jerome makes a good point, if oneOf can be used for datatypes, >we should show an example (perhaps in the datatype section) since >this will be a relatively complex construction - but very useful >(use case: saying a value must be the string "a", the string "b", >the string "c" or the string "d" would be very valuable in >recognizing legal answers for your online 'Who wants to be a >millionaire') Indeed I recall my remark because this is the place that I cannot translate from the XML syntax. The problem is that I have no example of expressing the oneOf parseType="collection" containing a set of litteral. It appears that the RDF/XML syntax only allows nodes (and no litterals) within parseType="collection". This is a modification from the rdf:li construct of the former recommendation that allowed litterals in collections. It seems important if we wish to constrain the value of an attribute to be among a set of litteral. So I will put a mail to RDFCore if they want to consider this problem. -- Jérôme Euzenat __ / /\ INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _ /_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_) 655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________ Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo 38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 10:43:17 UTC