- From: Jerome Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:41:11 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
- Cc: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
Hello,
still no answer to my question so I insist a bit:
In his message (Guide question (OneOf) (was Re: OWL datatyping and
exam) of 12/01/2003,
Jim Hendler wrote:
>p.s. Jerome makes a good point, if oneOf can be used for datatypes,
>we should show an example (perhaps in the datatype section) since
>this will be a relatively complex construction - but very useful
>(use case: saying a value must be the string "a", the string "b",
>the string "c" or the string "d" would be very valuable in
>recognizing legal answers for your online 'Who wants to be a
>millionaire')
Indeed I recall my remark because this is the place that I cannot
translate from the XML syntax. The problem is that I have no example
of expressing the oneOf parseType="collection" containing a set of
litteral.
It appears that the RDF/XML syntax only allows nodes (and no
litterals) within parseType="collection". This is a modification from
the rdf:li construct of the former recommendation that allowed
litterals in collections.
It seems important if we wish to constrain the value of an attribute
to be among a set of litteral. So I will put a mail to RDFCore if
they want to consider this problem.
--
Jérôme Euzenat __
/ /\
INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _
/_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_)
655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________
Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 10:43:17 UTC