- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 08:59:34 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
- To: Masahiro Hori <HORIM@jp.ibm.com>
- cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Masahiro Hori wrote: > >> This means that individuals can only be given types > >> which are named classes, rather than arbitrary class > >> descriptions. Is this right? > > As far as the individuals are concerned, that's true. > The syntax actually reflects to the Abstract Syntax [1] > in particular the following portion (Section 2.2 Facts): Ok. In that case my question is "is the Abstract Syntax right?" Cheers, Sean -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2003 03:59:45 UTC