- From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:08:57 -0500 (EST)
- To: hendler@cs.umd.edu
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
>Evan - Peter is right - it is section 4.5 of the Last Call Candidate >- the pointer to that section is > >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-InteractionExample Yep. Peter's hint to look for the Last Call Candidate instead of the "latest" version helped me find the version the WG has been talking from. He was, indeed, referencing the Clown example. Pretty frightening. It shows how important a standard import and versioning system is, I think ;|. However, I'm not sure it gets to the issue of an implicit (i.e. not appearing in any form in any of the documents referenced by an OWL document) cultural meaning that I thought was being brought up by Dan and Pat. This, to me, is even more troubling than extralogical content (but content none-the-less) having legal strength. -Evan
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2003 18:09:08 UTC