RE: Guide: New version

Jerome,

The 'onology' in my message was meant to be 'ontology'.
Thanks very much for the other notes.  Have fixed.  That's what happens
when you are in a hurry.

- Mike

Michael K. Smith, Ph.D., P.E.
EDS - Austin Innovation Centre
98 San Jacinto, #500
Austin, TX  78701

* phone: +01-512-404-6683
* mailto:michael.smith@eds.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr [mailto:Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Smith, Michael K; webont
Subject: Re: Guide: New version


Hello,

In his message (Guide: New version) of 07/01/2003,
Smith, Michael K wrote:
>See
>
>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/Guide.html
>
>A number of things are fixed in this version.  I have responded to nearly
>all
>the review points that we received.
>
>The datatype stuff is updated and needs review.

I update the stylesheet with this info.

A few comments on wine.owl (I assume the same for

- xsd entity (&xsd;) is not defined.
- it uses DataTypeProperty while the the Guide (at least in the 
section title) uses DatatypeProperty.

>Chris and I revised the discussion of onology to explain its traditional
use
>and its use in the Guide.

is it ontology or oenology ?

-- 
  Jérôme Euzenat                  __
                                  /      /\
  INRIA Rhône-Alpes,            _/  _   _   _ _    _
                               /_) | ` / ) | \ \  /_)
  655, avenue de l'Europe,    (___/___(_/_/  / /_(_________________
  Montbonnot St Martin,       /        http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
  38334 Saint-Ismier cedex,  /          Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
  France____________________/                Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr

Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2003 13:54:18 UTC