- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:33:49 -0600
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Thanks for the careful review by many in the WG. I've integrated the comments detailed below http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf5.html $Revision: 1.14 $ of $Date: 2003/01/17 23:32:22 $ and fixed a few more @@s. I still hope for presentation materials and a photo by Bijan. On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 02:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Comments on meeting record: > > I think that the editor's break-out debrief should also include a pointer > to Chris's second message on terminology. done. > It probably would be better to use a consistent reference to me in the > record. I fixed all the important references (i.e. in actions/decisions) to use Patel-Schneider. [...] On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 06:32, Bernard Horan wrote: > Dan > > just a couple of corrections that I can see: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf5.html#AllDiffere > I abstained on the AllDifferent vote. Sean's name is spelled 'Bechhofer'. Fixed. On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 18:37, David De Roure wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Just one thing just before "Closure on Requirements" and it's a problem > which I think I caused. I was leaving the room to go to a 2pm meeting > just as you held a vote and, since Hendler was deemed to abstain through > being out of the room, I thought it appropriate for me to run with an > abstention too. So noted. > In the minutes there is "DeRoo...abstaining" and also > "Action: De Roo". Do I (De Roure) have an action, or perhaps does De Roo > (it's confusing, sorry). De Roo took the action on specifying consistency checkers because Jeremy wasn't there, but he also abstained on the decision. On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 06:09, herman.ter.horst@philips.com wrote: > As can be seen in the IRC log, I took an action to review the > Semantics document. > I believe this action is due 23 Jan. Good catch. I hadn't made the review assignments into actions; now I have. > I believe that in Manchester two other members of the WG took an > action to review, > also by 23 Jan, these two parts: > > Jeremy Carroll: review AS & S Section 4 > Ian Horrocks: review AS & S Appendices Ah yes; those are now recorded as actions; thanks. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 18:34:03 UTC