- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:17:12 +0100
- To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
At 06:22 23/01/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote to an HP list: >I volunteered an "HP review" (i.e. mine if no-one elses) of > >http://www.daml.org/2002/06/webont/owl-ref-proposed An initial (edited) reaction was === The first thing I look at is: http://www.daml.org/2002/06/webont/owl-ref-proposed#Class which begins: [[OWL classes are viewed as sets of individuals]] An OWL class is not a set, and to view it as such is WRONG! [see] previous reviews [..] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Dec/0004.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jan/0001.html === Could I ask that the editors check that these comments raised on previous versions have been addressed, or respond negatively on the comments list. Is this document stable enough to review yet? I notice that the version number keeps changing - which is probably a good sign for the document quality, but makes reviewing more difficult. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:17:24 UTC