- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:56:41 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
This is a comment on: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/Guide.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/att-0344/01-owl-ref-v144 http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLOverview.htm all three documents say that intersectionOf is an OWL DL construct. However, the only use of intersectionOI that is prohibited in OWL Lite is its use to construct anonymous classes. The examples in the Guide, use intersectionOf to construct named classes which is an OWL Lite construct.. (I note further that the examples in the Guide use unionOf and complementOf to construct named classes which are not allowed in OWL DL as currently specified by the AS&S - I take this to be a bug in AS&S). Hence these documents should be changed to show that intersectionOf is in OWL Lite. (It might be simpler to update AS&S to remove complete class description from OWL Lite - I seem to remember somebody argued that they should be there - that was back in Amsterdam). A repeated comment on the Reference - the list of editors is still in need of updating to conform with W3C practice - see http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#editor "Editors are responsible for reflecting the proposals and consensus of the Working Group within a document." my understanding is that Mike Dean and Guus Schrieber are editors and the other named individuals may be contributors - some judgment as to how much of the text they contributed to the original DAML reference needs to be made. Since the amount of unchanged text is small, I would be surprised if any of them reach the author definition: "Authors are Working Group participants who make substantial contributions to a document" Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 05:56:16 UTC